Ezra Pound, a writer bothered by the violence and destruction of the
first World War uses the ancient myth of Acteon to fully show the hopelessness
the loss of innocence brought upon the man. Within the Ezra Pound’s disjointed
stanza alignment and the diction of opposing characters to expose the damage to
innocence due to the horrors of war.
Within the arrangement of stanzas
of “The Coming of War:Acteon” does one see the broken and disjointed feelings
of the narrator as each line is continually disjointed and plain. Each line in
it’s own disjointed way expresses the broken thoughts of the writer. For just
as “A sea/ Harsher than granite/ unstill, never ceasing”(Pound 7- 9) so is the
mind of the narrator, for the lines are broken up specifically to communicate
this indecision as Ezra to is uneasy and confused. Ezra also uses the sea as a
metaphor for the mind as it to is unstill and ceasing when agitated. This can
also be seen through the disjointed description of “Acteon of golden greaves! /
over fair meadows” the narrator is unsure of the hero of old for this can be
seen as he continues to switch between Acteon and the pastoral landscape of
golden fields. This helps to show the innocence of Acteon and those who’s
innocence was so selfishly taken away as Pound uses the pastoral scene to
heighten the tragedy of the rape of innocence.
This continual switching
within the last stanza itself and between stanzas creates a disjointed feeling,
a feeling of uneasiness. For between either stanza the narrator switches
between the description of Lethe and the hero Acteon. For “An image of Lethe”(1
Pound) brings to mind turmoil and destruction just as the river within Hades
that carries its name contrasts the “Acteon of golden greaves” a hero of old.
This contradiction helps to expose both the good and evils of war as both
horrendous and courageous actions are wrought upon the field. Within either
stanza both of these facts are exposed as Pound moves between stanzas helping
him to fully expose the horrors of war.
Similarly Within For Whom
The Bell Tolls by Ernest Hemingway the pains and torments of war is seen
through the continual changing of perspectives similar to that of Ezra Pound’s
poem “The Coming of War:Acteon”. For within each piece the switching of
perspectives be that through line arrangement or perspective of the viewer each
allows the reader to see the true horrors of war. Throughout For Whom The
Bell Tolls Hemingway continually switches perspectives to that of the enemy
exposing a man whom vocalizes “what a bad thing war is”(331 Hemingway). Yet
like Robert this enemy follows the orders given to him by his people. The similarity
in diction echoes that of Ezra Pound whom vocalized that war is “an image
of Lethe/and the fields”(1-2 Pound) are the waters of the river of oblivion.
For within war good men are killed by good men and this is exposed through
the subtle use of line arrangement and diction within both pieces
Through the use of diction
and Line arrangement both Ernest Hemingway and Ezra Pound truly expose the
horrors of war causing a loss of innocence within man. As each man works
to use the symbolism of each word to fully express their true emotions. For
within Ezra Pound’s poem the “Coming of War Acteon” the loss of hero through
that of the disjointed structure showing the hysteria caused by war. Hemingway
on the other hand uses the diction of two characters, men whom speak with the
same bitter tone for the violent nature of war itself.
I've noticed through quite a few presentations that a common theme is the loss of innocence or the movement to adulthood or becoming corrupt. Both Hemingway and Pound exhibit how war reads to this loss of innocence as you said. Overall I would agree that their choice of diction and their portrayal of such a concept allows the audience to see the shift of a person's life.
ReplyDeleteEzra Pound, as you said, comments on the “horrors of war”. This action and the horrors of it are shown through their perspectives, I agree. However, could the change in perspective lead to a change in each one’s language and writing style? I would like to learn more on how the language helps to illuminate these horrors. Each writer is said to have a shift, but does this shift happen when the warriors begin to change from innocent, before war, to corrupt afterwards. The difference in the way that the authors show this shift, I believe lies within how they write about it. What is different about their language and how they describe their version of the story? Overall illuminating these ideas of war is good, but I think that if you compared and contrasted the author’s portrayal through their style it could be more effective
DeletePlz mujy(And on said:
ReplyDelete"This is Acteaon."
Actaeon of golden) ki axplenayion bata dy plz